|
It’s
No Small Message—
Big Messages From Short Bible Books
3 John—“How are you, REALLY?”
A Sermon by Jim Hammond
Most people use the common greeting,
“How are you?” Do you
ever wonder if it’s really a question or simply a hello?
One Senior Citizen walked into the
cafeteria at the Senior Living Center and after sitting down with his
friends, she asked, “How are you?”
That got
things started. Everyone began talking about their ailments:
"My
arms are so weak I can hardly lift this cup of coffee," said one.
"Yes,
I know. My cataracts are so bad I can't even see my coffee,"
replied another.
"I
can't turn my head because of the arthritis in my neck," said a
third, to which several nodded weakly in agreement.
"My
blood pressure pills make me dizzy," another went on.
"I
guess that's the price we pay for getting old," winced an old man
as he slowly shook his head.
Then
there was a short moment of silence…
"Well,
it's not that bad," said one woman cheerfully. "Thank God, we
can all still drive."
Seriously, is the greeting, “How are
you” really a question? Do
we want to know? I have a
friend that greets me with the “How are you” greeting, and after
I’ve answered back with the typical, “Fine, how are you?” he will
say, “No, REALLY, how are you?” Now the greeting isn’t just a greeting but a real question.
Have you had a friend like that?
The question also communicates caring.
A connection is made. Today
we are going to look at John’s greeting to Gaius in his short letter
we now call 3 John and allow that greeting to become the lens through
which we look at the rest of the letter.
By doing this we will hopefully learn some important truths about
ourselves. We are going to
allow John’s ancient greeting to be used as God’s tool to ask each
one of us personally, “How are you, REALLY?”
Before we get into the letter and see John’s
greeting, let’s consider the background to this letter.
Background
It was about AD 90.
The Elderly Apostle John wrote his first letter to a troubled
church (1 John) from Ephesus and in the letter he described a
theological problem that some of the members of the church believed.
It was the heresy of Gnosticism, the belief that Matter is
inherently evil, and spirit is good.
The problem with the heresy was that it caused them to teach that
Christ could not have really come as a man in the flesh.
During this controversy, some of the people who did not agree
with the apostolic teaching left the church.
However, the controversy did not die.
Many of the false teachers who had left came back.
As a result John wrote the second letter (2 John) and confronted
the false teachers and told the church to stand firmly against the
“deceivers” who are “antichrists.”
The temptation for the Christians was to be kind, loving, and
hospitable to these former associates.
John emphasized the twin pillars of the faith, emphasizing truth
and love. To support these
“deceivers” would mean diluting the all-important central truths
about Christ. John told
them not to provide hospitality because that would support their
“ministries” and would do further damage to the Gospel, since these
teachers did not believe Jesus came in the flesh. The controversy didn’t stop after the second letter either.
John wrote 3 John to a friend named Gaius.
He commended Gaius for being hospitable to the emissaries that
John had sent. John had
been making repeated efforts to bring correction to the house churches
that were affected. The
situation had become critical. A
church leader by the name of Diotrephes was no longer listening to the
Apostle John whatsoever. Diotrephes
had rejected the first letter John had written.
Then John sent emissaries. It
became obvious that Diotrephes had rejected John’s authority.
He had gone as far as to reject the emissaries John had sent.
Diotrephes disallowed the congregation to accept, or show any
hospitality to these messengers of the Gospel that John had sent.
Diotrephes had gone so far as to tell the congregation that if
anyone in the church gave these men hospitality he would put them out of
the church and reject them along with John’s emissaries.
Diotrephes began spreading maligning rumors about the Apostle
John.
Here is where Gaius became the lone standing hero.
For reasons we do not know, Gaius did not fear Diotrephes.
Perhaps Gaius was a leader of a different house church so he
didn’t fear Diotrephes. Gaius
housed John’s friends and when he sent them off, he gave them monetary
support for their travels and continued ministry effort.
Word quickly got back to John about the events that transpired.
Upon finding out what happened, John wrote this quick note we
call 3 John, a personal letter of praise and encouragement to Gaius who
had remained faithful to the Apostolic truth and he demonstrated his
loyalty to John himself. John’s
third letter was a letter to say he would come personally as soon as
possible, though he couldn’t come immediately.
So he sends this letter by way of a courier he commends to Gaius
by the name of Demetrius. John
knew he would need allies like Gaius when he would personally go to
confront Diotrephes. 3 John is the shortest letter in the entire New Testament,
but don’t be fooled; “It’s No Small Message.”
Focus:
(The Big Message) We must each carefully look to the health of
our own souls because some who believe themselves to be prospering are
spiritually impoverished.
3 John
1:1-14 (NIV)
1The
elder, To my dear friend Gaius, whom I love in the truth.
2Dear friend, I pray that you may enjoy good health and that
all may go well with you, even as your soul is getting along well. 3It gave me great joy to have some brothers come and tell
about your faithfulness to the truth and how you continue to walk in the
truth. 4I
have no greater joy than to hear that my children are walking in the
truth.
5Dear friend, you are faithful in what you are doing for the
brothers, even though they are strangers to you. 6They have told the church about your love. You will do well
to send them on their way in a manner worthy of God. 7It was for the sake of the Name that they went out,
receiving no help from the pagans. 8We ought therefore to
show hospitality to such men so that we may work together for the truth.
9I wrote to the church, but Diotrephes, who loves to be
first, will have nothing to do with us. 10So if I come, I will call attention to what he is doing,
gossiping maliciously about us. Not satisfied with that, he refuses to
welcome the brothers. He also stops those who want to do so and puts
them out of the church.
11Dear friend, do not imitate what is evil but what is good.
Anyone who does what is good is from God. Anyone who does what is evil
has not seen God. 12Demetrius
is well spoken of by everyone—and even by the truth itself. We also
speak well of him, and you know that our testimony is true.
13I have much to write you, but I do not want to do so with
pen and ink. 14I
hope to see you soon, and we will talk face to face.
Peace to
you. The friends here send their greetings. Greet the friends there by
name.
I. How are you REALLY?
(2)
2Dear
friend, I pray that you may enjoy good health and that all may go well
with you, even as your soul is getting along well.
Is this verse a greeting primarily, or a prayer, or
a promise? It is expressed
as a prayer but it serves as a Christianized form of a conventional
greeting. Some people
today, continue to use this verse in their teaching as if it were
John’s intention to teach us that God promises to prosper us
materially and in other ways proportionately to how our soul prospers.
What do you think? This
greeting is certainly NOT the major point of the letter.
Oral Roberts is an example of one person who went too far with
this verse. He began to
teach the prosperity Gospel based on his view of this verse.
Many at many churches have used this verse with the emphasis Oral
Roberts placed upon it. But
now people even among Pentecostal groups are bringing needed correction
to how this verse is being used. For
example, one teacher at the Pentecostal Church of God School of Theology
in Cleveland, Tennessee, is now using this verse in his introductory
classes on biblical interpretation to show how context determines the
understanding of the phrases.[i]
He disagrees with Oral Roberts interpretation of this verse.
John’s reason for writing the letter had nothing
to do with teaching about prosperity as it relates to the soul. This phrase then falls in the realm of greeting more than
promise. But it is a
greeting stated as a prayer. There
is nothing wrong with praying that someone should prosper even as his
soul prospers, but this is saying something much less than saying God
promises that we will prosper materially, or physically, as our soul
prospers.
Even though this verse does not teach the
prosperity gospel, it does nevertheless bring up an important way of
evaluating our own lives. We
do need to ask the question, how is it with my soul?
So with this concept in mind, we will notice from the rest of
this letter that there are people who are prospering yet their souls are
impoverished, just as there are some people who are poor monetarily, or
are experiencing poor health yet their souls are prospering.
Having said that, I want to use this comparison of prospering
souls with impoverished souls as we evaluate the key players in this
letter.
The context indicates that Diotrephes was an
impoverished soul though outwardly everything looked wonderful. By contrast we will look at Gaius who according to John had a
soul that was prospering. Let
us consider what a prosperous soul looks like, and by contrast what an
impoverished soul looks like as we learn more about Gaius and
Diotrephes.
A. The Prosperous Soul
(Gaius)
1.
Is Faithful to the Truth (3-4)
3It
gave me great joy to have some brothers come and tell about your
faithfulness to the truth and how you continue to walk in the truth.
4I have no greater joy than to hear that my children are
walking in the truth.
Gaius
had listened to John, learned from John and now was living out the truth
he learned. Gaius proved
his loyalty to John and the truth.
2.
Loves and Serves Others (5) For the sake of the Name
(7)
5Dear friend, you are faithful in what you are doing for the
brothers, even though they are strangers to you.
Kurtis the stock boy
In a supermarket, Kurtis the stock boy, was busily
working when a new voice came over the intercom asking for a carry out
at check register 4. Kurtis
was almost finished, and wanted to get some fresh air, and decided to
answer the call. As he approached the checkout stand a distant smile
caught his eye, the new check out girl was beautiful. She was an older
woman (maybe 26, and he was only 22) and he fell in love.
Later
that day, after his shift was over, he waited by the punch clock to find
out her name. She came into the break room, smiled softly at him, took
her card and punched out, then left. He looked at her card, BRENDA. He
walked out only to see her start walking up the road.
Next
day, he waited outside as she left the supermarket, and offered her a
ride home. He looked harmless enough, and she accepted. When he dropped
her off, he asked if maybe he could see her again, outside of work. She
simply said it wasn't possible. He pressed and she explained she had two
children and she couldn't afford a baby-sitter, so he offered to pay for
the baby-sitter. Reluctantly she accepted his offer for a date for the
following Saturday.
That
Saturday night he arrived at her door only to have her tell him that she
was unable to go with him. The baby-sitter had called and canceled. To
which Kurtis simply said, "Well, let’s take the kids with us.
"She tried to explain that taking the children was not an option
but again, not taking no for an answer, he pressed. Finally Brenda
brought him inside to meet her children. She had an older daughter who
was just as cute as a bug, Kurtis thought. Then Brenda brought out her
son, in a wheelchair. He
was born a paraplegic with Down syndrome. Kurtis asked Brenda, "I
still don't understand why the kids can't come with us?" Brenda was
amazed. Most men would run away from a woman with two kids, especially
if one had disabilities, just like her first husband and father of her
children did.
That
evening Kurtis and Brenda loaded up the kids and went to dinner and the
movies. When her son needed anything Kurtis would take care of him.
When he needed to use the rest room, he picked him up out of his
chair, took him, brought him back. The kids loved Kurtis. At the end of
the evening, Brenda knew this was the man she was going to marry and
spend the rest of her life with. A
year later, they were married and Kurtis adopted both of her children. Since then they have added two more kids.
So what
happened to the stock boy and check out girl? Well, Mr. & Mrs. Kurt
Warner, now live in St. Louis, where he is employed by the St. Louis
Rams and plays quarterback.[ii]
He’ll be playing in today’s Super Bowl game.
I tell you this story as an example of loving and serving others.
Speaking at a Billy Graham crusade in St. Louis
last fall, Warner told a crowd of 40,000 people, "Who am I? I am a
devout Christian man. I am not a football player. That is what I do.
When I throw a touchdown pass now, my thoughts are on how I can use this
success on the field as a platform to glorify and praise my Lord Jesus
Christ. People often ask the secret of my success as a football
player. It has nothing to do with how I work out in the off-season or my
diet. The secret of my success is simply Jesus Christ."[iii]
From what I have read about him, here is a man who
is trying to love and serve others for the sake of The NAME.
3.
Is a Ministry Partner (6-8)
B. The Impoverished Soul
(Diotrephes)
1.
Loves to be first (9)
9I
wrote to the church, but Diotrephes, who loves to be first,
Diotrephes enjoyed a great measure of prestige,
power, and influence, but he wanted more prestige power and influence.
Outwardly he looked as if he had it all together.
The impoverished soul looks at a partner as the competition and a
rival because he wants to be number one.
Competition is how Diotrephes viewed John and the missionaries
John sent. John was a
threat to Diotrephes position and power.
USA Today All-Joes Team (in its 10th year)
"If you work hard,
good things will happen…to someone else."
So goes the motto of the All-Joes Team. Each year USA Today
honors overlooked and often unappreciated football players by naming
them to what the newspaper calls its All-Joes Team. Now in its tenth
year, the All-Joes award celebrates men who sacrifice their egos for the
good of their team. Some players simply have "slob" jobs, all
down-and-dirty tasks that yield no statistics. Think of our worthy
fullbacks, who rarely get a carry or see a pass thrown their way. Think
of all those offensive linemen. It
is these little known, little recognized players that are picked for the
All-Joes Team.
We as
Christians need to work for someone else's glory also. Our role is to
diminish so that Jesus may increase.[iv]
The All-Joe motto:
If you work hard, good things will happen—to someone else.
Gaius didn’t mind
proving this motto to be true, Diothrephes would have hated proving this
motto true because he loved to be first.
He didn’t like serving to make good things happen for others.
What about you?
Whereas Gaius is Faithful to the truth, Diotrephes is faithful only
to himself.
2.
Rebels against God given authority (9-10)
“.
. . will have nothing to do with us.”
Diotrephes may look to be in control but he is in rebellion
(Rebellion is willful living outside of God’s control) (10)
10So
if I come, I will call attention to what he is doing, gossiping
maliciously about us. Not satisfied with that, he refuses to welcome the
brothers. He also stops those who want to do so and puts them out of the
church.
It is possible, though not provable by this letter,
that Diotrephes aligned himself with the false teaching confronted in 1
& 2 John and began openly opposing John’s teachings about the
person and work of Jesus. It
is more likely however that this is not the case since John did not
address him as a “deceiver” as he did the false teachers of 2 John.
The fact that he had been able to persuade others to his
viewpoint demonstrates that he is no intellectual slouch.
Some are falling for his schemes.
Even if he was a bad example and leading people away from God’s
will, he was a leader.
Diotrephes thought he had it together and didn’t.
His hidden spiritually impoverished condition was
becoming exposed and would be exposed further.
If you judge yourself, you can make corrections and avoid God’s
judged. If you humble
yourself, you will avoid being humiliated.
INVICTUS
The Oklahoma City bomber, Timothy McVeigh embraced
the poem "Invictus," by William Ernest Henley. According to
Lou Michel and Dan Herbeck, in their book, American Terrorist, McVeigh
intended to include some of its lines in his last words.
I didn’t hear whether he did or not, but here are some of the
words from Invictus [v]
It
matters not how straight the gate,
How charged with punishments the scroll,
I am the master of my fate,
I am the captain of my soul.
Invictus is the Latin
word for invincible, a poet’s tribute to self-reliance. The last
stanza describes the attitude of people like Timothy McVeigh or
Diotrephes, or for anyone else who puts too much stock in self-reliance
as they disregard God ordained authority.
People like McVeigh or Diotrephes are in for a painful surprise.
Jan Davis’ Surprise
Consider now Jan Davis’ surprise. Jan Davis, 60, a professional veteran parachutist, was
involved in a dangerous sport called BASE jumping—leaping off fixed
objects like cliffs and towers. It was while BASE-jumping that she fell
to her death October 22, 1999.
Her husband, who was filming the jump, and several
reporters were stunned when Jan, the 4th of 5 jumpers, fell for 20
seconds and crashed into the rocks. Her chute had not opened properly.
She was jumping off the 3,200 foot granite cliff, El Capitan, in
Yosemite National Park, California.
She and the other jumpers knew that BASE-jumping is
illegal in Yosemite Park. The
law was adopted because there had already been six deaths in Yosemite
along with numerous injuries due to BASE-jumping. The five jumpers were
in fact protesting the park's jumping restrictions and, ironically, were
jumping to prove that the sport is safe.
[Jan Davis wore black and white stripes in mockery of the fact
she could be arrested for her jump.
She also wore some borrowed older equipment because she assuming
her own expensive equipment would be confiscated upon her arrest.]
These jumpers not only knew the risks, they also
knew the law and deliberately broke it. Jan Davis paid with her life.
In a similar way, many people think they can
deliberately violate God's law. But eventually people learn, sometimes
the hard way, that God's laws are there for a reason: our well being. [vi]
Whereas Gaius Loved and Served Others For the sake of the Name,
Diotrephes hindered others for the sake of his Name, His Reputation.
3.
Is a Ministry Hindrance (10)
Whereas Gaius Is a Ministry Partner, Diotrephes is
a ministry Hindrance even though he calls himself a ministry leader!
The purpose for this letter is to continue the process of
confrontation. John planned
to come and confront Diotrephes. We
don’t know whether he did, and what became of it.
What we do know is that a very strong contrast is
before us. We need to
answer the question about ourselves.
How are we REALLY? Are
we like Gaius because our Souls prosper, or are we more like Diotrephes?
We look like we are doing okay on the outside, we profess to be
doing okay, but when God asks, “How are you REALLY?” God knows when
we are not “just fine.”
·
How are you REALLY?
·
How is it with your soul?
·
Are you faithful to the Truth?
Or have you been BASE jumping, doing things you know to be
outside of the will of God?
·
Do you Love and Serve Others For the sake of the Name?
Are you okay with the Motto:
If you work hard, good things will happen—to someone else.
Who do you need to love and serve?
What can you do?
·
Are you a ministry partner? How can you partner up in ministry to further the cause of
Christ?
[i] Gary M. Burge tells about
how Chris Thomas helps point out the errors Oral Roberts
interpretation of this verse at the seminary.
The NIV Application Commentary
pp. 249-250
[ii] Source unknown.
Received as an email forward.
[v] Citation: Julia Keller,
"McVeigh and 'Invictus': A Murderer's Last Words," Chicago
Tribune (4-20-01); submitted by Lee Eclov
[vi] Citation: Jonathan R.
Mutchler, Ferndale, Washington; source: Kiley Russell, Associated
Press (10-23-99)
|